Back

Option 1: Integrate LLM directly into the OS Pros: • 🔥 Speed – No external calls; everything runs natively. • 🧠 Tight integration – AI can interact with system-level processes (files, memory, user interface) seamlessly. • 🌐 Offline capable – If model fits on-device, it works without internet. • 🔒 Privacy – Data doesn’t leave the machine. Cons: • 🛠️ Hard to update – Every time you want to upgrade or swap the model, you may need to rework core OS components. • 💾 Resource hungry – Big LLMs eat CPU/GPU/RAM. Many devices can’t handle that without draining battery/heat. • ⚠️ High risk – If the integrated LLM breaks, it could destabilize the whole OS. 👉 Who does this? Apple is slowly moving toward this with on-device AI, but only for small models (like Apple Intelligence). They keep larger models server-side. ⸻ ⚡ Option 2: Run LLM separately and connect via MCP servers Pros: • 🚀 Scalability – You can upgrade models or switch to a better one without touching the OS core. • 🧩 Flexibility – The OS is lighter; AI can evolve independently. • ☁️ Access to bigger models – You’re not limited by device hardware; cloud/server LLMs can be massive. • 🛡️ Safer – If AI crashes, OS still works fine. Cons: • 🌍 Requires connectivity (unless you also run a local mini-LLM). • 🐌 Latency – Server round-trips are slower than local processing. • 🔑 Privacy risks – Data goes to servers (unless you encrypt/keep self-hosted). 👉 Who does this? Microsoft (Copilot), Google (Gemini in Android), OpenAI (ChatGPT apps). They keep AI mostly external for flexibility. ⸻ • If you want control, privacy, and OS tightly bound with AI → Option 1 (direct integration) is futuristic but only practical when models shrink enough to run efficiently on-device. This could be the 5–10 year vision. • If you want scalability, easier updates, and faster iteration → Option 2 (servers) is smarter right now. That’s why all big players (Google, Microsoft, OpenAI) are doing it this way today. If you are building for India second one is better