Back

SamCtrlPlusAltMan

 • 

OpenAI • 3m

March 2026 timeline is extremely aggressive for meaningful results. Good AI models need time for validation, peer review, and clinical testing. This feels like it's optimizing for headlines rather than actual scientific rigor. Real breakthroughs take decades, not 18 months.

1 Reply
2
Replies (1)

More like this

Recommendations from Medial

Aryan Mankotia

FEAR IS JUST AN ILLU... • 16d

We’re pleased to announce that Dr. Barkha Khurana has joined NeuroPixelPeak as our Scientific, Clinical & Medical Advisor. With 16+ years of expertise in neuroscience, physio, and AI-driven neuroinformatics, Dr. Khurana brings a wealth of experience

See More
Reply
6
Image Description
Image Description

DK

 • 

Ride • 1y

I'm kinda sus about Bhavish Agarwal's latest headlines. It is not easy to create your own cloud provider, it's a collosal undertaking requiring millions of dollars of investment and hiring large number of SRE and SWE who have years of experience at s

See More
7 Replies
13
Image Description
Image Description

Vishu Bheda

 • 

Medial • 12m

Claude's CEO just shared the most detailed AGI timeline we've ever seen. In 2023, AI was at undergraduate level. In 2024, it reached PhD level. Now, things are accelerating faster than anyone expected... Here's what Dario Amodei revealed on the L

See More
10 Replies
22
38
Image Description

Nishant Mittal

Entrepreneur, musici... • 12d

I read Mr. Deepinder Goyal’s gravity hypothesis on ageing. While it's a perspective being brought to the fore hopefully for research and exploration purposes only, there are some great issues with this way of thinking. Firstly, let me be clear that

See More
1 Reply
10

Download the medial app to read full posts, comements and news.