Back

The biggest mistake early founders make? They build for applause, not utility. Build something a few people desperately need, not something a lot of people kinda like.

3am post:- A very random one. It turns out that you can enter any industry and distrup it. But you need to know, what's next and the relevance/utility (the point of problem) point. Humans evolve and in the same way the wants of the customers and li

What's happening to Sarvam has happened to so many consumer apps that claimed they were made for Bharat but didn't have a better use case than global counterparts even after great funding. The world doesn't care about the Bharat sentiment, they care

Building real projects is the fastest path to career growth. In 2025, the smartest learners are shifting gears — mastering the fundamentals, building real-world projects, and solving business problems instead of chasing every new tech trend. It’s not

Warren Buffet on what makes Coke special: "Coke does not have a “taste memory". Orange or grape soda accumulates and you get sick of it. There is no diminishing marginal utility of taste for Coke. He doesn’t believe there has ever been a word wr

Buy this, it’s high quality” is the dumbest pitch. People buy emotionally for utility, not specs. Everyone has a car, but not everyone buys a Rolls or Mercedes. Why? Quality isn’t the driver. It’s what it does for them. Sell outcomes, not adjectives.

MVPs aren't supposed to be pretty. they're supposed to punch you in the face with utility.

How genuine to you feel is Cred? Is it worth the hype the founder has made or not? Is there any extra utility usage in cred compared to other old players? Let me know the customers(consumers) opinions.

🎯 The Impact Matrix: The Simplest Way to Validate If Your Startup Actually Matters In a world obsessed with launching, scaling, and pitching, there’s one thing most founders forget to ask: “Is this even worth building?” Here’s a powerful mental m