I'm a pro medialist • 1y
Case study of Juul : A disruptive yet failed product Juul was a vaping device initially launched for older people who wanted to get away from smoking cigarettes! Juul, introduced in 2015, promised a safer alternative to smoking with its sleek design and nicotine delivery system. Initially celebrated for its innovation, Juul faced rapid backlash as concerns emerged over its appeal to underage users and aggressive marketing tactics. Regulatory scrutiny and lawsuits followed, leading to a dramatic decline in valuation and public trust. Despite efforts to address concerns, including halting flavored product sales and restructuring, Juul's downfall serves as a cautionary tale of the challenges inherent in disruptive products within highly regulated industries, highlighting the importance of responsible marketing and regulatory compliance. And this is how a slow nicotine delivery device, which was proposed for older people who wanted to leave smoking, became a miserably failed product!
Love making startups... • 10m
Analyzing the Pros and Cons of Alerta: A Compact Emergency Assistance Device for Women's Safety. While it offers immediate help with live tracking and multiple functionalities, concerns about privacy, dependence on technology, and potential technical
See MoreLife is a cruise me ... • 6m
smokers die early .. true but what if smokers live long and give good aroma and healthy fumes for second hand and third hand smokers ..Inventions are made for humans so same new invention herbal smoke sticks are getting prepared no tar no nicotine np
See More•
OpenAI • 3m
New York-based Jones, founded by Hilary Dubin and Caroline Vasquez Huber, raised a $10 million Series A round led by Foundry, valuing the nicotine lozenge startup at around $45 million. Jones aims to modernize nicotine replacement therapy with a styl
See MoreDownload the medial app to read full posts, comements and news.