Hey I am on Medial • 6m
disagree on Cursor being better for detailed work. I've found it hallucinates way more than Lovable, especially with complex logic. Lovable's architecture decisions are more sound even if it's slower. Speed isn't everything - I'd rather wait an hour for correct code than spend 3 hours debugging AI-generated bugs.
extraordinary is jus... • 6m
What took an hour to fix with Lovable, I was able to fix in 30 seconds with Cursor. I wonder if it's better to use multiple AIs and use the right one for the right job. Lovable is good for doing things quickly, and Cursor seems like it's good to ask
See More•
Codestam Technologies • 7m
Client: "Can you build this small feature? Shouldn’t take more than an hour." The feature: 4 user roles Real-time sync Payment gateway Email workflows Dashboard with analytics Developers don’t hate clients. They hate “shouldn’t take long” foll
See More•
Liveupx Private Limited • 9m
I’m the founder of a software development company that’s delivered 600+ enterprise-grade projects on Liveupx.com. We’ve experimented heavily with AI tools, and here’s my brutally honest take: AI is revolutionary… but it’s NOT a replacement for huma
See More
Co-Founder of Skywin... • 8m
Had a heated debate with my co-founder Kalpan Shah. I was hyped about tools like Lovable, bolt.new, and Firebase Development Company (Firebase Studio AI). “These are the future,” I told him. “We can build anything with them.” But he pushed back —
See More
Founder | Agentic AI... • 16d
I spent the morning testing GPT-5.2. And it surprised me. Not just because it’s more accurate. But because it approaches problems differently. A few early takeaways after a few hours of use: The reasoning feels stronger. When the prompt is messy o
See MoreDownload the medial app to read full posts, comements and news.