Back

Ravi Handa

Early Retiree | Fina... • 1m

ANI is a propaganda machine, no doubt. But on the Mohak Mangal issue, they’re technically in the right. They sell content for a living. If creators use their footage without permission, ANI striking them isn’t censorship. It is CAPITALISM ! For those arguing fair use - I agree with you. But my opinion or your opinion doesn't matter. YouTube does not decide that. They will delete your channel. You will need to go to court and get a court order to get that reversed.

1 Reply

Replies (1)

Sanskar

Keen Learner and Exp... • 1m

Yes I agree with your point however asking for 30 to 40 lakhs for just using a 9 - 11 second video is a lot Taking the whole video revenue makes much logic to me which is what T series does but as you said none of our opinion matter on this let's hope for the best

Recommendations from Medial

Saket Sambhav
•

ADJUVA LEGAL® • 1m

Big Media vs. YouTuber: Silencing Critics or Fair Game? 🤔 News agency ANI is suing YouTuber Mohak Mangal. Defamation, copyright, the works. Standard legal toolkit. But step back. When a media powerhouse legally targets a critic: ✅ Can it also be

Kritarth Mittal • Soshals

Founder, Soshals | C... • 1m

When will Indians stop demonising wealth? Anyway, let me educate you. In India, "fair use" means limited use of copyrighted material without the copyright holder's permission, primarily for specific purposes like research, criticism, and reporting.

1 Reply