Back
Rishabh Raj Pathak
Polymath • 1d
That’s why I mentioned asymmetrical bet. Totally hear you and you’re right to an extent because I agree, not everyone can afford to take big risks. But choosing the right playground makes a huge difference and what kind of ideas you choose to pursue. For example, if someone wants to get into real estate or start a physical store with inventory, the risk is huge, lakhs upfront, middlemen, regulations, connections. That’s a tough game to play without serious resources. In contrast, what I meant by “asymmetrical bets” applies more to digital-first fields(immediate example). If you're a developer or someone with technical skills, the cost of experimenting is often just your time, effort, and learning curve. You can build a SaaS, a tool, a micro-product, or even test a niche idea, after hours, while keeping your day job. Worst case? You gain new skills, build your reputation, maybe even some distribution. Best case? Something clicks : users, revenue, or even investor interest or a startup founder could come across your app and see value in acquiring it. So yes, not every kind of bet is low-risk. But choosing the right playground makes a huge difference. Asymmetrical bets are all about keeping the downside small while leaving room for unexpected upside.
More like this
Recommendations from Medial
Download the medial app to read full posts, comements and news.