Back

What's your take on this? This is from The Psychology of Money by Morgan Housel. "Studying a specific person can be dangerous because we tend to study extreme examples—the billionaires, the CEOs, or the massive failures that dominate the news—and

Startups in India promise to disrupt markets, but often get disrupted by endless paperwork, taxes, and compliance hurdles. It feels like innovating with one hand tied behind your back. What’s the most frustrating obstacle you’ve faced while building

Founders are often clueless about many things, but they're never clueless about their passion.

Agriculture startups have been emerging rapidly, but many struggle to sustain and scale. Challenges like unpredictable weather, fragmented supply chains, regulatory hurdles, and slow tech adoption often lead to failure. However, with advancements in

𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁-𝘂𝗽𝘀 : In India, most startups are based on repeated ideas. There are unicorns and successful or famous startups that are even based on previous ideas. But the definition of a startup says: { 'A startup is a 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂�

We often talk about India becoming a superpower, but we can't ignore the high wealth inequality here. Have you ever felt that India is actually a poor country in some situations?

Most of the startup founders and early stage startups looking hard to find the CTO's/ Techies for building their products. While the skilled tech persons chasing high packages 😂 It's Very hard to find the techie than starting a startup. Anyone agre

Startups Are the Slowest Way to Make Money While startups sound exciting, they’re usually a slow way to make money. Many take years to break even, let alone make a profit. Founders work long hours on their products and teams but often see little re

📍 The Indian startup culture has indeed been hyped up to some extent, fueled by success stories and investment frenzy. However, the reality often differs from the glossy image portrayed. Challenges like fierce competition, regulatory hurdles, and fu

Many startups offer equity in place of a competitive salary. But how many of those equity offers actually pay off? Is it smarter to take a low salary with high equity or a high salary with no ownership?