Back

Sam Altman says the o3-mini will be worse than the o1 pro 👀

OpenAI launches o3-mini, a new AI reasoning model on Friday. Here are the highlights - -> More reliable: Fact-checks before responding, excelling in STEM fields like programming, math, and science. -> Faster & cheaper: 63% lower cost than o1-min

I want a list of reasoning questions that openai o1 and/or deepseek r1 is failing to answer correctly. Quick help is much appreciated. Working on something and want to test it for reasoning capabilities.

Apple just exposed the truth behind so-called AI "reasoning" models like Claude, DeepSeek-R1, and o3-mini: They’re not actually reasoning — they’re just really good at memorizing patterns. Here’s what Apple found:

Well, Evanth AI is gonna offer o1 mini and preview at just 99₹ a month. We’ve listed 20+ Premium Models as of now at 99₹.

🚨 2025 AI RACE IS WILD! 🚨 Round about Q1 is DONE, and look at the SOTA lineup: - GPT-4.5 - Claude 3.7 Sonnet - Grok 3 - Gemini 2.5 Pro - Qwen 2.5 - Llama 4 - GPT-4.1 - OpenAI O3-Mini - DeepSeek R1 AND... O3 & O4-Mini dropping THIS WEEK

What a crazy week in AI 🤯 Open ai dropped O1 and O1 pro model.. at the same time google silently dropped it’s new model to API which is better than O1 preview as per benchmark. I’m not a gemini fan but google is really working hard on this. What d

deepseek r2 leaks • 97.3% cheaper than gpt-4o • 1.2t parameters, 78b active, hybrid moe • 5.2PB training data, 89.7% on C-Eval2.0 • better vision, 92.4% on COCO • 82% utilization in huawei ascend 910b new era 🔥

3B LLM outperforms 405B LLM 🤯 Similarly, a 7B LLM outperforms OpenAI o1 & DeepSeek-R1 🤯 🤯 LLM: llama 3 Datasets: MATH-500 & AIME-2024 This has done on research with compute optimal Test-Time Scaling (TTS). Recently, OpenAI o1 shows that Test-

So Deepseek is nothing but an improved GPT4 wrapper. I'm not saying that's its bad, bust it's most likely a government funded company which burning as crazy (as GPT4 api costs are 107 times more than of deepseek v3)