🚀 Medial Secures Investment on Shark Tank India - Fueling the Future of Professional Social Networking. 🔥
Login

News on Medial

US to propose how Google should boost online search competition

Economic TimesEconomic Times · 10m ago
US to propose how Google should boost online search competition
Medial

- U.S. Department of Justice to outline actions against Google to restore competition in online search - Possibility of a breakup of Alphabet's Google as a measure to address its illegal monopoly in online search - Smaller rivals pushing for Google to spin off its Chrome browser or stop paying billions to make its search engine the default on devices like iPhone - Judge's ruling in an ongoing case labeled Google's monopoly illegal, potentially reshaping internet search practices in the U.S. - Google plans to appeal the ruling, claiming competition from other search engines and platforms like Amazon - Yelp and other competitors advocate for the breakup of Google, including spinning off Chrome and prohibiting favoritism in search results

Related News

The Google antitrust case must not end with a slap on the wrist

Economic TimesEconomic Times · 11m ago
The Google antitrust case must not end with a slap on the wrist
Medial

A federal judge has ruled that Google holds a monopoly on online search, and that it has illegally defended this monopoly for several years. The judge's decision raises the question of what the remedy should be. The remedy needs to break down the barriers that protect Google's monopoly, rather than just deliver a slap on the wrist. The government's case focused on the payments Google makes to be the default search engine on Apple and other devices, which the judge determined weakened Google's competitors. However, simply ending these agreements won't be enough to promote competition. The remedy should ensure fair competition in the search market and in emerging markets for AI-driven tech services. Examples from the past, like the remedies imposed on AT&T in the mid-20th century, can provide guidance for effective remedies. For instance, forcing Google to divest from its web browser, Chrome, and the Android operating system could improve prospects for competitors. Another possibility is granting free and open access to Google's AI technologies and data, similar to the 1956 AT&T decree. These remedies would level the playing field and promote innovation in the industry. It's important to remember that companies produce their best products and services when faced with strong competition. Therefore, it's time to give others a chance in the online search market.

Google offers to loosen search deals in US antitrust case remedy

Economic TimesEconomic Times · 7m ago
Google offers to loosen search deals in US antitrust case remedy
Medial

Google has proposed loosening its agreements with Apple and other companies to address allegations of unlawfully dominating the online search market. The proposal aims to restore competition but is narrower than the government's push to make Google sell its Chrome browser. Google argues that antitrust remedies should not stifle innovation, especially in an era of AI advancements. The focus should be on distribution agreements, such as those with browser developers and mobile device manufacturers. The proposal suggests making agreements non-exclusive and unbundling the Play Store from Chrome and search for Android manufacturers. Revenue-sharing agreements, which are crucial to independent browser developers, would remain intact. The proposal will be evaluated in a trial set for April, where further remedies may be considered, including the potential divestment of Chrome and Android.

Download the medial app to read full posts, comements and news.