🚀 Medial Secures Investment on Shark Tank India - Fueling the Future of Professional Social Networking. 🔥
✕
Login
Home
News
Messages
Startup Showcase
Trackers
Premium
Premium Content
Jobs
Notifications
Settings
Try our Valuation Calculator →
Log In
News on Medial
Powerless but profitable: How Google India evades accountability
Entrackr
·
9m ago
Medial
In a legal filing, Google India Private Limited clarified its limited role as a mere operational arm of Google LLC, while claiming to have no authority over key services such as YouTube, Ads, Search, G Suite, Google Play Store and others. Google India claimed it only operates as a “non-exclusive reseller” of the Google Ads program in India and functions solely as a support entity, according to a judgment by Bombay High Court in August 2021. A lawyer representing Google India took a similar stance while arguing in the case of Dinkum Data Solutions Private Limited v. Google India, heard on October 14, 2024, at the District Court of Gurugram. The lawyer argued that Google India lacked authority regarding the GSuite email service dispute, contending that Google LLC, as the relevant entity, should be included in the case. Based on this argument, the judge directed the petitioner to add Google LLC as a party to the proceedings. Entrackr attended the court proceedings in person. This revelation sparked concerns among Indian businesses, which face challenges addressing issues locally due to Google India’s lack of control and accountability over the very products and services driving their operations in India. Entrackr also analyzed the petition filed on 24 August 2021 by Google India, (Google India Pvt. Ltd vs. The Bombay Talkies Studios And Ors) where it was emphasized that Google India“does not act as an agent” for Google LLC. Instead, it operates independently, providing only limited support without control over crucial decision-making and management functions tied to Google’s services. In simple words, Indian users and businesses who encounter problems with Google’s services have no alternative but to address these issues with Google LLC, based in the United States. This logic seems flawed and no longer tenable, as Google India reported over Rs 28,000 crore in gross ad revenue with substantial profit in FY23. Thus, even as the firm continues to generate hefty revenues from India, its local operating entity’s toothlessness to provide adequate support or resolve issues for its clients here is beginning to grate. A burden for Indian businesses This limited role Google Indiapresents costly challenges for local companies as Google LLC has no offline presence nor any support team in India. When problems arise, Indian businesses find themselves forced to engage with the teams based in the US or approach legally, a process that can be both time-consuming and financially burdensome. Making one wonder if this was designed to be deliberately so. Thus, unresolved issues often end up in long legal proceedings—a last resort that no business wants to pursue unless absolutely necessary. The situation has also put a heavy financial and operational strain on India’s judicial system. Court cases involving support from Google can take years to conclude, and while a company waits for a resolution, its business continues to suffer, which means that essential matters like data access, service continuity, or even payment processing might be halted, impacting the business’s viability. Vasundhara Shankar, Managing Partner at Verum Legal, explained, “It’s true that Google LLC, the main U.S.-based entity, lacks a direct physical or ‘offline’ presence in many countries, including India, despite generating substantial revenue from these markets. India’s evolving regulatory landscape could introduce more stringent requirements, potentially compelling tech giants to expand their legal and operational footprint within the country.” Google India’s position: local support only Google India has reiterated its limited jurisdiction in its petition, stating that it “maintains a principal-to-principal relationship” with Google LLC and does not operate any core product platforms, such as YouTube or Search, within India, as per the judgment cited above. The petition underscores that any complaints or regulatory actions involving Google’s core services should target Google LLC, which controls all operational and decision-making powers for all services being rendered in India, to its customers. This structure effectively shields Google India from being held accountable for issues stemming from Google’s main services in India. Despite generating substantial revenue through ad sales and other indirect income sources, Google India lacks the authority to directly address concerns from Indian businesses and users. Its position as a support entity means it has no sway in policy changes, customer complaints, or dispute resolutions, leaving Indian businesses to navigate these issues independently or seek costly, time-intensive legal recourse. The larger regulatory debate This situation comes against the backdrop of an ongoing dispute with the Competition Commission of India (CCI) regarding Google’s alleged monopolistic practices, such as requiring device manufacturers to pre-install Google apps on Android devices, a practice criticized as anti-competitive. The CCI’s scrutiny reflects India’s need for regulatory clarity as global tech giants continue to consolidate influence in the Indian market. However, Google India’s limited powers highlight a structural challenge: how can local regulators ensure accountability when decision-making authority resides in another country? This challenge highlights the urgent need for a robust regulatory framework to address foreign tech subsidiaries’ responsibilities within India. Many Indian businesses argue that if Google India can derive revenue from the Indian market, it should be empowered to address local grievances. Otherwise, the accountability gap leaves Indian businesses and consumers to deal with extended service disruptions and limited avenues for redress. Toward a new regulatory paradigm? Google India’s petition cited above may set a significant precedent for tech companies operating in India through foreign parent entities. As more global tech giants establish Indian subsidiaries, it raises a pressing question: should these entities have greater accountability if they are conducting business locally? The answer has implications not just for Google but for the wider landscape of international tech companies that have entrenched themselves in India’s economy. Importantly, in case of social media firms like Google , Meta and others, the argument of India being a small market in the context of global revenues does not hold, as due weightage needs to be given to user base as well, where India is a key market for most, if not all. There is a growing call for the Indian government to mandate that major tech companies empower their Indian subsidiaries with greater authority to handle disputes and service issues. Such a policy would not only bolster consumer protection but also ensure that these corporations remain directly accountable within Indian jurisdiction, aligning with the country’s push for digital sovereignty and data localization. For now, Google India’s legal stance underscores a need for Indian businesses to carefully consider the limitations of subsidiaries in resolving disputes. And until legal and regulatory changes catch up, Indian businesses continue to bear the brunt of an arrangement that shields Google’s parent company from direct accountability, while their operations suffer in the absence of swift and effective resolutions.
View Source
Related News
Mentorship Dynamics in Shark Tank India
StartupTalky
·
1y ago
Medial
Shark Tank India serves as a transformative mentorship platform, where entrepreneurs not only gain financial support but also industry expertise and connections, unbiased guidance and feedback, accountability, support in risky situations, skill development, enhanced problem-solving abilities, and assistance in product development. The show has featured successful startups like Beyond Snack, Skippi Ice Pops, Snitch, and Unstop, showcasing how mentorship extends beyond financial backing and contributes to the growth of startups in India. Mentorship plays a significant role in the startup ecosystem, making a lasting impact on the entrepreneurial journey.
View Source
Google accused of suppressing internal records amid antitrust trials: Report
Livemint
·
8m ago
Medial
Google has been under fire in multiple antitrust trials for its internal communications practices. The tech giant has been accused of suppressing evidence, deleting messages, and using attorney-client privilege to avoid scrutiny. These practices have been seen as a way to restrict internal communication and evade accountability. Google has defended its actions, but judges have criticized the company's document retention practices. Legal experts warn that these practices may create the perception of guilt and damage Google's credibility.
View Source
Musk's X withholds accounts, tweets in India to obey orders
TechCrunch
·
1y ago
Medial
X (formerly known as Twitter) announced that it is withholding specific accounts and posts in India due to executive orders from the Indian government. X disagreed with the action taken but stated that non-compliance could result in fines and imprisonment. The lack of disclosure surrounding the executive orders is concerning, as it leads to a lack of transparency and accountability. India has become an important market for global technology firms, and the country's amended IT rules grant the government more power to enforce compliance from internet services. Concerns have been raised regarding pre-censorship and the lack of accountability in the blocking of accounts related to farmers' protests.
View Source
ETtech Explainer: X, Centre at loggerheads over social media misuse - The Economic Times
Economic Times
·
16d ago
Medial
The Indian government and Elon Musk's platform X are in a legal dispute over content-blocking orders, with X claiming these orders harm its business and violate free speech. The government argues for accountability to curb harmful content. The case questions the Information Technology Act's provisions regarding content removal and intermediary "safe harbour." The dispute impacts how social media moderates content in India, potentially leading to revised regulations affecting all platforms, not just X.
View Source
Self-regulatory body to fix guardrails for growing influencer marketing business
Economic Times
·
3m ago
Medial
A new self-regulatory body, the India Influencer Governing Council (IIGC), aims to regulate the burgeoning influencer marketing sector, projected to reach Rs 3,375 crore by 2026. Comprising industry giants like Hindustan Unilever and Google, it introduced a 79-page Code of Standards to ensure legal, honest, and transparent influencer content. The IIGC also launched India Influencer Ratings, promoting accountability and quality content, addressing challenges like lack of standardization, and fostering trust and responsibility in the digital ecosystem.
View Source
FBI Agents Are Using Face Recognition Without Proper Training
Wired
·
1y ago
Medial
According to a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), only 5% of FBI agents with access to face recognition technology have taken the bureau's training course on how to use it. The FBI has used face recognition software from external providers for tens of thousands of searches in recent years, but lacks a policy to protect privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties. Concerns about improper use and errors indicate the need for adequate training on this technology. The report also highlights instances of false arrests due to incorrect identification by face recognition models.
View Source
Should AI decisions be explainable to the average user?
Inshorts
·
3m ago
Medial
As AI influences more decisions from credit scores to medical recommendations, users deserve to know how those outputs were generated. Explainability ensures accountability. Without it, AI risks becoming a black box that no one can challenge or understand. Transparency isn't optional it's the foundation of responsible AI adoption.
View Source
Companies using GenAI should follow self-regulation to unlock potential: Mastercard CEO
Economic Times
·
1y ago
Medial
Private sector companies should take a proactive approach to establish responsible AI guardrails for innovation, according to Michael Miebach, CEO of Mastercard. He suggested that self-regulation and simple principles similar to data privacy could be applied to AI, including transparency, privacy, security, accountability, and integrity. Miebach spoke at the B20 Summit in India, emphasizing the potential for generative AI to automate mundane tasks for small businesses in countries like India. IBM's CEO Arvind Krishna also highlighted how AI deployment could enhance productivity and boost per capita GDP.
View Source
Epic Games CEO fears Google may still be able to stifle Play Store competitors
Business Insider
·
1y ago
Medial
Fortnite owner Epic Games has won an antitrust case against Google, but CEO Tim Sweeney is concerned that Google will not have to eliminate its high fees. The lawsuit accused Google of preventing access to competing app stores and paying developers to discourage competition. A San Francisco federal court will decide in January how Google will have to change its business practices, which could potentially cost the company billions. Sweeney fears that Google may offer solutions that do not actually promote competition and still collect high fees. Google plans to appeal the verdict.
View Source
How Google Maps solved India's street name problem; Former employee explains
Livemint
·
1y ago
Medial
To address challenges with Google Maps in India, a global design team, led by a former Google executive Laraki, conducted on-the-ground research to understand how Indians navigate. They discovered that many Indians rely on landmarks instead of street names for directions. Google Maps incorporated landmarks like parks, monuments, shopping centers, landmark buildings, and petrol pumps into its navigation system. This approach transformed Google Maps into the dominant navigation product in India, catering to local navigation preferences and improving user experience.
View Source
Trackers
Active Indian VC’s
OG Capital
Email
With a hands-on approach, OG Capital aims to invest in over 20 promising...
Accel Partners
Email
Early and growth-stage investments in disruptive technology companies with...
Blume
Email
Early-stage venture capital firm investing in technology startups in India. Focus on...
Access All Trackers
Startup Showcase Winners
June 2025
Buddy
Helping your parents when you are miles away
BiteStop
The Pit Stop Your Cravings Deserve
Bloomer
The next generation E-commerce platform
Enter Ongoing Startup Showcase
Top Users
Trending News on Medial
Download the medial app to read full posts, comements and news.
Go to Medial App
Not Now
Know everything that’s happening in the startup ecosystem, first.
Enable Notifications?
No, thanks
Count me in