NA • 3d
The first round of a hackathon is the most uncomfortable one — for everyone involved. Judges are expected to evaluate hundreds of ideas in a limited time. They want to be fair. They want to guide. But reality forces fast decisions, and with that comes a quiet guilt — knowing some teams deserved more than a silent rejection. Participants feel the other side of it. A rejection arrives with no explanation. No clarity on whether the idea was close, flawed, or simply misunderstood. That silence creates confusion. And confusion kills learning. This isn’t a judging problem. It’s a process problem. Early-stage evaluation was never designed to scale clarity, feedback, or learning — only elimination. I’m building in public to explore how this first round could be more transparent, humane, and explainable — without adding burden on judges or noise to the process. Sharing the journey as it evolves. #buildinpublic #buildathon Built using @dreamflow

We make automations ... • 1m
Most SOPs don’t fail because they’re missing — they fail because they’re never enforced. Written SOPs create comfort, not clarity. Real SOPs remove confusion, define ownership, and demand accountability. If two people can follow the same SOP and ge
See More
Business Consultant ... • 7m
: "Most Startups Don’t Need Funding—They Need Focus" 90% of founders I talk to think capital will fix their chaos. Truth is, money multiplies clarity—or confusion. ✅ What you actually need first: – Crystal-clear positioning – A problem worth solving
See More
Code-driven. Startup... • 10d
We just posted Episode 0 of our founder journey on Instagram. Right now there’s no funding, no roadmap, no clarity on where this ends up. Just figuring things out as we go and deciding not to hide that part. This isn’t advice or a success story. Mo
See More
Download the medial app to read full posts, comements and news.