Back

Also, our model is asset-light, like OYO’s early model—we don't own or fully manage properties. We just list and verify them, making it more scalable and flexible. Zolo, on the other hand, operates more like a co-living company—they manage entire buildings, which is heavy on operations. Lastly, we’re offering modular pricing—base rent plus optional add-ons like cleaning, food, etc., based on the tenant’s needs. So it’s more flexible for students or professionals with different budgets. So yeah—it’s OYO + Zolo + Airbnb + ghar ka khana, but designed for real-life, daily struggles of tenants in big cities.

Great question. See, platforms like Zolo and Homeversity are doing great work—but my idea takes a slightly different approach. First, we’re focusing on a two-way feedback system—where not just tenants rate the flats or landlords, but landlords can also rate tenants. It’s similar to how Airbnb works. This builds trust and creates a better ecosystem for both sides. I haven't seen this implemented seriously on Zolo or Homeversity. Second, we’re integrating tiffin services that feel like ghar ka khana—not just hostel mess food. A proper, app-based system where users can subscribe or pause meals as needed. That emotional and daily value-add is missing on those platforms.