šØ šššš©šššš¤ šš²š©š š¢š¬ š ššš¢š§š ! ššš«š'š¬ šš”š². šØ DeepSeek made waves with bold claims and strong benchmark scores. But now, the excitement is cooling down. Why? š¢ šš„šØš° š«šš¬š©šØš§š¬š šš¢š¦šš¬ ā Even basic prompts take too long, hurting user experience. š§Ŗ šššš„-ššØš«š„š ššš«ššØš«š¦šš§šš ā Performance in actual use cases doesnāt match the hype. š¤ ššÆšš«-š©š«šØš¦š¢š¬šš ā Claimed to beat GPT-4, but feels closer to GPT-3.5 in reality. š šššš¤ šØš šš«šš§š¬š©šš«šš§šš² ā Key training data and methods arenāt clearly shared. š¬ ššØš¦š¦š®š§š¢šš² š¬š¤šš©šš¢šš¢š¬š¦ ā Early buzz is turning into tough questions and criticism. Itās a reminder: flashy scores donāt replace real-world value. Have you tried DeepSeek? Whatās your experience? hashtag#AI hashtag#GenAI hashtag#DeepSeek hashtag#MachineLearning hashtag#LLMs hashtag#OpenSourceAI hashtag#ArtificialIntelligence hashtag#AICommunity hashtag#TechTrends hashtag#AIHype
Download the medial app to read full posts, comements and news.