Back

I was reading an article today, and it was just random fluff - no real information, no firsthand experience, and nothing related to the title. I’m pretty sure it was generated by AI. Not sure where we’ve ended up. The internet used to be a place fo

I was right

but this was already there right?

Noticing that Gemini AI > Chat GPT 3.5, is there anyone who also think like this?

Noticing something funny Shitposts = reach. Actual client work = silence. Guess I know why growth feels slow :) #twitter #buildinpublic #shitpost

“This article was written on 4 August, and I kept it in draft for a bit — partly because I wasn’t sure if the mood was right to hit ‘publish’. Looking back, I believe I was smart to wait. In India right now, too often the filter is political judgemen

Something I keep noticing while handling physical books: Strong covers don’t try to tell the whole story. They communicate what kind of story it is. Genre clarity, readable titles, and the right mood matter more than clever details. Readers make d

Something I keep noticing while handling physical books: Strong covers don’t try to tell the whole story. They communicate what kind of story it is. Genre clarity, readable titles, and the right mood matter more than clever details. Readers make d

Something I keep noticing while handling physical books: Strong covers don’t try to tell the whole story. They communicate what kind of story it is. Genre clarity, readable titles, and the right mood matter more than clever details. Readers make d