Back

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct vs. Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs. GPT-4o: Coding LLM Comparison https://techwavearena.com/qwen2-5-coder-32b-instruct-vs-claude-3-5-sonnet-vs-gpt-4o-coding-llm-comparison/

this guy spent 8 hours testing ChatGPT o1 pro ($200/month) vs Claude Sonnet 3.5 ($20/month)

AI Model Performance Benchmarks: 🚀 Comparing Claude, GPT-4o, and Gemini Across Key Tasks with Claude 3.5 Sonnet performing best overall, especially in code (93.7%) and reasoning (65.0%). Gemini 1.5 Pro excels in math (86.5% with 4-shot CoT). GPT-

Anthropic has unveiled Claude 3.7 Sonnet, its most advanced AI yet and the first hybrid reasoning model. It combines rapid responses with deep, step-by-step reasoning, redefining AI problem-solving.

guy on reddit made gpt4.5 leak its system prompt 🔗 https://www.reddit.com/r/PromptEngineering/s/JoOsQyQndl

I finally understood the difference between Claude Code and Cursor. The answer is that Cursor will punish you for writing a bad prompt. if you write a good prompt it will give you good results, and if you write a bad one, you will get bad results.

the whole system prompt of claude has been leaked on github 👀 24k tokens long, it defines model behavior, tool use, and citation format. 🔗 https://raw.githubusercontent.com/asgeirtj/system_prompts_leaks/refs/heads/main/claude.txt

Tired of managing too many AI tools? Here’s your all-in-one solution! I thought I was burned out, but it turns out I was suffering from *AI Subscription Stress.* Too many tools, too many payments, and zero productivity. Then, I discovered *Abacus

Meta has released Llama 3.1, the first frontier-level open source AI model, with features such as expanded context length to 128K, support for eight languages, and the introduction of Llama 3.1 405B. The model offers flexibility and control, enabli

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝟱 𝗔𝗜 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝘂𝗰𝗸 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗺𝗲 𝗿𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗮𝗳𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗹𝗮𝘂𝗻𝗰𝗵 (𝗻𝗼𝘁 “𝗯𝗲𝘀𝘁,” 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝘂𝗻𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲): • Claude 3.5 Sonnet – balanced, smooth, felt almost human. • o3 – search + s