Back to feeds

I started books just to avoid digital devices and blue light, ebooks might dominate in the future but there will be market for physical copies (if there will not be any i will print one myself and read)

Printed books are good for collection but E books are just more convenient

In today's world, most people lead a busy lifestyle. Ofcourse nothing can compare to the feeling of holding a hard copy book but carrying it around and reading from it can be a hassle. For ex- I personally travel in metros so ebooks are more convenient there.

Printed books always

Only a true reader knows the feeling of reading from an actual book which can never be matched by an e-book ever!

In my opinion printed books will be there in near future, because holding a book gives different kind of feelings as compared to reading books on screen, but personally i prefer printed books and audiobooks

E-books are low price. But readers always prefer hard copy..

I believe in some segments, it already had! I do personally read e-books only.

I think people need quick commerce for printed books too. Most of them want anything in just minutes that's the problem. Even they dont like reading ebook. They always prefer printed books.

It is likely that both formats will coexist for the foreseeable future, each catering to different preferences and circumstances.

No way , printer books will always be the best

As A Publisher House This Is What I Got 1.After COVID People Thought That Ebook Will Be Dominating In The Market But Reading from a paperback book may cause less eye strain for some individuals compared to reading from a screen, especially for long periods.And People Wants To Reduce The Same 2. Paperback provides a great experience, allowing readers to feel the pages and the weight of the book. 3. Paperback books often have visually appealing covers and designs, giving readers a sense of aesthetic satisfaction. 4. Some readers enjoy collecting physical copies of books, finding joy in building personal libraries or displaying their collections. 5. Flipping through the pages of a physical book is often easier and more intuitive for readers compared to navigating digital interfaces. 6. Paperback books do not require batteries or charging, allowing readers to enjoy uninterrupted reading sessions.

See , majority people in india have a say that don't see screen for a long time or it will affect ur eyes so one of he reasons which I see that ebooks can't surpass printed books

Never gonna happen. E-books may be cheap and easily accessible,but majority people(including me) prefer printed books beacause of the memories and the attachment which one gets while starting the journey from first page to ending the journey with the last page.

Smart move by China. Ebooks are way faster to comprehend and customize reading experiences.

I will always prefer paperback

China has been the only country where ebooks have surpassed Printed Books.

It depends on people personally I love to read only printed books and I don’t feel like reading a book when I read a E-book

See it can but the thing is that the screen time is aldredy increasing a lot and physical books can decrease them I personally read through ebook but would like to use hard copy So the % of ebook will keep increasing but stop after a point untill a good e-reader is invested (kindle is nice)

I tried a ebook, since everything around my life controlled by Digital. I want to stay away from digital and physical book is a good choice for that. When see the trend I felt that I am not alone 😀😀