News on Medial

Related News

PMLA court summons Raj Kundra after ED chargesheet in GainBitcoin probe

EntrackrEntrackr · 11d ago
PMLA court summons Raj Kundra after ED chargesheet in GainBitcoin probe
Medial

A PMLA court in Mumbai reportedly issued a summons to businessman Raj Kundra after taking cognisance of the agency’s supplementary chargesheet. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has moved a step forward in its probe into the GainBitcoin cryptocurrency scam. Kundra has been asked to appear before the court on January 19, 2026. The development is part of the ED’s ongoing investigation into the GainBitcoin scheme, a Bitcoin-based Ponzi operation allegedly run by Amit Bhardwaj, who died in January 2022, and his brother Vivek Bhardwaj. The scheme is estimated to have defrauded investors of thousands of crores. The agency has reportedly accused Kundra of being a beneficiary of proceeds generated through the scam. Kundra allegedly received 285 Bitcoins in 2017 from the main accused for setting up a Bitcoin mining operation in Ukraine. However, investigators have reportedly stated that the proposed project did not take off. The agency has further claimed that Kundra failed to furnish wallet addresses or sufficient documentary proof to support his claim that he acted only as a facilitator in the transaction. The ED has reportedly maintained that Kundra exercised control over the Bitcoins, making him a “beneficial owner” under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. At current market prices, the Bitcoins in question are estimated to be worth over Rs 150 crore. ED had earlier provisionally attached assets worth over Rs 97 crore linked to Kundra, including a residential property in Mumbai and cryptocurrency holdings, as part of the same investigation. Kundra has denied any wrongdoing and has reportedly stated that he was unaware of the fraudulent nature of the GainBitcoin scheme. The court summons marks another key development in the ED’s broader crackdown on crypto-related financial crimes. The GainBitcoin case continues to remain one of India’s largest cryptocurrency fraud probes, with multiple accused and several attachment orders issued over the years.

Startups face regulatory heat as ED probes deepen in 2025

EntrackrEntrackr · 5m ago
Startups face regulatory heat as ED probes deepen in 2025
Medial

Startups face regulatory heat as ED probes deepen in 2025 India’s Enforcement Directorate (ED) has intensified its scrutiny of startups in 2025, launching a series of investigations across various sectors, including gaming, fintech, and e-commerce. What started as a few separate investigations has now turned into a larger crackdown, putting a spotlight on how some of India’s top-funded startups follow rules around foreign investment, business structure, and overall compliance. One of the most high-profile targets this year has been opinion trading platform Probo, which came under the ED scanner in July. The agency conducted searches across multiple locations and seized assets worth Rs 284.5 crore, alleging that Probo’s model, where users trade on real-world outcomes, amounts to illegal betting and violates the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). While the company has denied any wrongdoing and assured full cooperation with the authorities, on July 15, the Punjab & Haryana High Court heard Probo’s plea to quash the FIR and unfreeze its bank accounts. Though the court declined interim relief, it asked the state to respond regarding partial unfreezing. The matter is now listed for the next hearing on August 26. After the ED intervention, the case has become part of a broader debate over how such platforms are classified and regulated in India’s evolving legal landscape. Around the same time, Myntra, the fashion platform owned by Flipkart, became the subject of a fresh FEMA complaint filed by the ED. The case revolves around alleged misuse of FDI norms to the tune of Rs 1,654 crore. According to the ED, Myntra operated under the wholesale cash-and-carry model, which is eligible for 100% FDI through the automatic route, but was effectively engaged in multi-brand retail by routing goods through a group entity, Vector E-Commerce. According to this structure, ED claims that it has violated caps on intra-group sales and circumvented retail FDI restrictions. The complaint has been placed before the adjudicating authority in Bengaluru. Another startup in the ED’s crosshairs is Simpl, a buy-now-pay-later (BNPL) platform operated by One Sigma Technologies. The agency has alleged FDI violations worth Rs 913 crore, stating that the company misclassified its operations as IT services to raise foreign capital under the automatic route—when in fact, its activities fall under regulated financial services, which require prior government approval. The case underscores a growing pattern where fintech startups offering credit-linked services are being questioned over regulatory arbitrage in FDI filings. In parallel, Paytm and its subsidiaries have come under the ED’s radar for alleged violations of foreign exchange rules. In April 2025, the agency issued a show-cause notice to One97 Communications, Little Internet, and Nearbuy India, citing FEMA breaches worth Rs 611 crore. The matter relates to overseas investments made between 2015 and 2019, which were made before Paytm acquired the entities, without following the RBI’s reporting and pricing norms. While Paytm has maintained that the issue predates its ownership and has no impact on current operations, the case adds to the growing list of startups grappling with retrospective scrutiny over FDI compliance. The scrutiny hasn’t been limited to the domestic startup ecosystem. Global forex trading platform OctaFX is under ED investigation for allegedly laundering nearly Rs 800 crore through unauthorized forex trading in India. The agency claims the firm used fake KYCs, mule accounts, and shell companies to route funds overseas. Assets worth over Rs 292 crore, including a yacht and Spanish real estate, have been attached, with the case ongoing under the PMLA. The ED’s widening crackdown signals a shift from legacy probes to deeper scrutiny of digital-first businesses. For founders and investors, compliance is no longer optional; it’s a live operational risk. The sheer breadth of probes also indicates just how badly tangled with red tape regulations remain in India, pushing everyone to break the rules in one way or another at times. The sheer number of hoops that firms have to jump through, and consequently, the huge amount of time they can save by taking what are sometimes advised as ‘safe shortcuts’, frequently leads to missteps. We have no doubt that, going by the letter of the law, perhaps even ED (which has a terrible conviction record, going more for settlements) will find some overstepping, besides the obvious criminality in some cases. But the larger issue remains the mess that are regulations, and the failure of regulators to address these issues. Regulation in India has been interpreted almost exclusively as a role whose job is to ‘protect’ the end consumer, something where it is easier to pass off tokenism as action. We believe regulators who take a more holistic view, including making life genuinely easier for the firms they are supposed to regulate, will achieve a lot more eventually for the whole ecosystem.

Download the medial app to read full posts, comements and news.