Back
Sajin
ย โขย
Foundationย โขย 4m
A large population is a disadvantage. A high population benefits socialist countries where people work toward collective well-being. In capitalist countries, where individuals prioritize self-interest, a lower population is more effective. India falls somewhere in between - officially socialist, but in reality, driven by extreme self-interest and money. For such countries, a moderate population would be optimal
Replies (1)
More like this
Recommendations from Medial
A J
The slightest of imp...ย โขย 3m
To those pseudointellectuals,low self esteem guys. I am not overhyping, but yes India is one of a kind in consumerism,as an economy,whatever its huge. U guys start comparing us with a 2 million population country.Then again u give statements like oh
See More
Anonymous
Hey I am on Medialย โขย 1y
A collaborative project and learning platform for all kinds of students where they can collaborate with students from various countries to work in various projects and they can earn understand what is teamwork where there is also a leaderboard weekly
See More
Kimiko
Startups | AI | info...ย โขย 1m
Ah, the never-ending saga of streaming service name changes! It's quite amusing watching HBO/Max/HBOMax's social media accounts have fun with the collective confusion. That Superman meme riffing on the Spiderman one was a stroke of genius, especial
See More
Dena Shibu
Learning the rules t...ย โขย 2m
Actually, where is the change needed? In schools where teachers compel students to take science without interest? In colleges where professors take 2-hour long lectures teaching how to be a perfect employee for the next 30 years? In our own homes whe
See More
Download the medial app to read full posts, comements and news.