🚀 Medial Secures Investment on Shark Tank India - Fueling the Future of Professional Social Networking. 🔥
Login

News on Medial

Related News

Tata chose startups more on ‘intuition’, less on numbers

LivemintLivemint · 9m ago
Tata chose startups more on ‘intuition’, less on numbers
Medial

- Ratan Tata created a pitch deck for entrepreneurs to tap investors within a month of joining Instagram in December 2019. - The 16-slide deck advised founders on elements such as the core problem, unique selling proposition, validation with data, competitive information, revenue model, and team details. - Getting funded by RNT Associates, Tata's personal investment vehicle, was considered a badge of credibility in the years between 2012 and 2016. - Despite his vast wealth, Tata made relatively small investments in startups, often relying on intuition rather than numbers when selecting investments. - Tata's advice to founders included thinking long-term, prioritizing the customer, and building lifetime relationships rather than focusing on single transactions. - Besides investing in startups, Tata also acted as an adviser to venture capital firms such as Chiratae Ventures, Jungle Ventures, and Kalaari Capital.

VerSe denies revenue manipulation charges, calls claims baseless and defamatory

EntrackrEntrackr · 1m ago
VerSe denies revenue manipulation charges, calls claims baseless and defamatory
Medial

VerSe Innovation, the parent firm of Dailyhunt and Josh, has categorically denied allegations of financial impropriety involving UK-based Builder.ai, calling them “factually incorrect, baseless, defamatory, and misleading.” In a telephonic interview with Entrackr, VerSe’s Co-Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Umang Bedi, dismissed the accusations and shared actual AWS Portal monthly usage backed by monthly invoices from Builder, cloud services historic Jira tickets, custom app development environment proof on Builder Home Portal, 26+ version releases, 18+ upgrades and patches and ad server campaigns with campaign tracking viewability and CTR metrics along with sample invoices issued to Builder.ai for advertising services. These invoices, the company claims, are part of a fully auditable trail and align with the revenues declared in its financial statements. “Any insinuation that VerSe colluded with Builder.ai to inflate revenues, engaged in reciprocal billing without corresponding services, or manipulated invoicing practices to avoid suspicion is entirely false and irresponsible,” the company said in an official statement. VerSe clarified that over the past five years, it had availed services worth $80 million from Builder.ai, which included AWS infrastructure, cloud services, custom software and application development. These included hyperscaler AWS cloud deployment, system migration, and custom app development. During the same period, Builder.ai engaged VerSe for advertising and promotional services, paying a total of $53 million, creating a clear imbalance in the trade. “All revenues and expenses recorded were for legitimate services rendered and delivered—either directly or through subsidiaries,” the company said, adding that all payments were appropriately received or made and verified by third-party auditors. The company further pointed out that each transaction involving Builder.ai underwent extensive scrutiny during its statutory FY24 audit. “Each such transaction was validated and checked thoroughly,” the company added. The audit concluded with an unmodified opinion, indicating that VerSe’s financials presented a true and fair view in accordance with Indian Accounting Standards. While the auditors flagged some internal control weaknesses in the standalone reporting, VerSe emphasized that this did not impact the financial accuracy of the statements. “These material weaknesses... do not affect our opinion,” the audit report clarified. VerSe stated it reserves the right to pursue legal remedies against those propagating what it deems to be falsehoods. “We operate with transparency and legal compliance, and our records can withstand any examination,” the spokesperson added. With the controversy “behind us,” VerSe said it is now focused on achieving breakeven in H2 FY26, driven by its AI-first product suite—NexVerse.ai, Dailyhunt Premium, Josh Audio Calling & Stories, and VerSe Collab.

No hurry to sell, indefinite horizon on Zomato holding: Sanjeev Bikhchandani

EntrackrEntrackr · 1y ago
No hurry to sell, indefinite horizon on Zomato holding: Sanjeev Bikhchandani
Medial

Info Edge, India’s largest and most storied recruitment portal, has had a stellar run in the last three years with its portfolio company Zomato’s market cap surging almost 2.3X since its stock exchange debut. The firm’s bet on fintech unicorn Policybazaar is also paying off well. The company has made it clear it is in no hurry to book profits on these investments, even as it continues to nurse its own brands beyond Naukri to profitability. The firm, one of the few to survive the dotcom boom and bust cycle of 2000, has been led by founder and chairman Sanjeev Bikhchandani for a large part of this journey. And today, Bikhchandani has earned the right to be looked up to as the statesman for the sector. Entrackr caught up with Bikhchandani in his Gurugram office and he spoke on a range of topics including Naukri, Info Edge’s investments, serial entrepreneurs and corporate governance. Here are the edited excerpts. As a listed firm that carries a heavy overhang from its investment portfolio, does it worry you that it might impact the valuation of the core Naukri business? Not really. Institutional investors are smart. We give them adequate data so that they analyze Naukri thoroughly before making a conclusion about valuation. We don’t run Naukri for valuation every day or month or quarter. We look at how we create value for our shareholders in the long run. And that’s how we run our businesses. So, this hypothesis about our core or even group business doesn’t stand. Info Edge has been an investor in Zomato for over 14 years and despite the latter’s share price rising nearly 14o% from its listing price, Info Edge didn’t sell its shares. What level of return are you anticipating from Zomato? Actually, we don’t calculate Investment Return Rate (IRR). Info Edge invested in Zomato because of our conviction that it could become a great company. And if you are convinced about your conviction then it will happen. So, IRR is the happy incidental outcome of investing early behind companies that you want to help. That’s my belief. We are not in any hurry to sell and have an indefinite horizon. Every VC firm has a fund cycle and pressure to return capital to their limited partners but that’s not the case with Info Edge as you are investing from your own balance sheet. Could you elaborate on this? That pressure does not make this choice. We have a long term horizon and we call it patient capital. To be a successful early stage investor in India, you have to be quite patient because companies take anywhere between 10-15 years to go to IPO from seed stage. So if you have funds for only 6-10 years, you will not realize the full fruits of your investment. If you have a 20 year fund, you tend to perform better. However, such a horizon could be possible only when you’re investing from your own whole balance sheet. Do you believe that Blinkit could become bigger than Zomato? I think both are large but Blinkit is going to be fairly large. If we look at Zomato’s quarter-on-quarter numbers, online food ordering appears to have stagnated in top 10-15 cities. What’s your take on this? Obviously, there is the base effect. But, we don’t see stagnation. Also, you need to compare year-on-year, not quarter-on-quarter. When YoY numbers are compared, there is growth. I think full fiscal year performance is more important than quarter. We used to commonly hear about Naukri’s recruitment business that it was not the online presence, but your sales force or feet on the street that made the difference. Does that still hold true? Online sales have never been a big part of our strategy. When you want to sell more expensive products, you need face-to-face contact. At Naukri, we have clients whom we bill several crore rupees for annual subscription and such accounts need heavy offline touch. While the product will be consumed online, the stuff around it very often will be offline. Over the years, several players have tried to crack the recruitment business in the blue collar segment but most of them died. What are the challenges in the segment? Blue collar segment has broadly three challenges. First, it’s hyperlocal. The job seekers in this segment don’t move to different cities as they look for opportunities in and around their locality. Second, very often there isn’t a detailed text CV which makes the process slow and inefficient. Third, potential workforce in the segment do not search for jobs on the laptop and use vernacular languages. They are mostly on mobile. So you’ve got to adapt to all these things and still somehow get revenue and profit. We have been trying to get inroads in the blue collar segment for over two years now but we have just started monetizing it. Our future position in the segment depends on monetization. Some of the celebrated entrepreneurs are launching a second or third company without their first startup churning profit. How do you see this trend? I think this isn’t a progressive trend. As an entrepreneur, you need to focus on one thing and do really well. Once you’ve cracked that you can add on a second thing in the same company. Over the past couple of years, we have witnessed corporate governance issues with some startups. Even Info Edge saw serious lapses at 4B Networks. What’s your opinion about this? By and large, my belief is that 95-98% of Indian founders are genuine but there will be a few bad examples. Investors make sure that when something wrong happens in their portfolio, it is highlighted and actions are taken to ensure that such incidents do not repeat. Any governance issue isn’t good for anyone including limited partners, investors, founders and the startup ecosystem. What factors contributed to the lack of success with Info Edge’s e-commerce investments 99labels, MyDala, and Happily Unmarried? Limitation of raising foreign direct investment (FDI) and heavy investment into competition were two major reasons for failure of 99labels while MyDala had a product market fit (PMF) issue. Happily Unmarried is now a part of VLCC and we are still a shareholder there.

Curefoods posts Rs 746 Cr revenue in FY25, dessert-led income grows 95%

EntrackrEntrackr · 18d ago
Curefoods posts Rs 746 Cr revenue in FY25, dessert-led income grows 95%
Medial

Curefoods posts Rs 746 Cr revenue in FY25, dessert-led income grows 95% Cloud kitchen brand Curefoods has filed its Draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP) with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) for an Initial Public Offering (IPO). The move follows the company’s FY25 financial performance, where it reported a revenue of Rs 746 crore and a loss of Rs 170 crore, according to its balance sheet. Curefoods' operating revenue increased by 28% to Rs 746 crore in FY25 from Rs 585 crore in FY24, while its losses remained flat in the last fiscal year. Curefoods operates a multi-brand cloud kitchen business across categories like Indian meals, pizza, desserts, and health-focused food. In FY25, desserts led revenue with Rs 196 crore, followed by pizza (Rs 183 crore), Indian meals (Rs 178 crore), and healthy meals (Rs 176 crore). While desserts and pizza grew 18% and 95% YoY, respectively, the healthy segment declined by 13%. The Bengaluru-based company added Rs 29 crore from interest on financial assets which pushed its total income to Rs 775 crore in FY25. On the expense side, the cost of materials accounted for the largest share at Rs 273 crore, followed by employee benefit expenses at Rs 180 crore and commissions at Rs 137 crore. Advertising costs jumped significantly by over 64% to Rs 87 crore. Overall, the company’s total expenditure stood at Rs 944 crore in FY25, rising by 17% from Rs 807 crore in FY24. Despite the revenue growth, Curefoods’ loss remained flat at Rs 170 crore in FY25 from Rs 173 crore in FY24. Its ROCE and EBITDA margin stood at -19% and -7.5%, respectively. On a unit level, the company spent Rs 1.27 to earn a rupee of operating revenue in FY25. As of March 2025, the Ankit Nagori-led company had current assets worth Rs 339 crore in FY25, including Rs 80 crore in cash and bank balances. Curefoods’ founder Nagori is entitled to an annual fixed remuneration of Rs 3 crore (inclusive of perquisites and retirement benefits) and an annual variable bonus of up to 20% of his remuneration. Curefoods’ operational performance improved in FY25, with average daily sales rising to Rs 2 crore from Rs 1.5 crore in FY24, amid strong consumer demand across its brands. Among its 10 key brands, Sharief Bhai, EatFit, and CakeZone led revenue with Rs 148 crore, Rs 145 crore, and Rs 102 crore, respectively. The company also added new revenue streams through the launch of Krispy Kreme operations in South, West, and North India, with Rs 15 crore in revenue in FY25 after acquiring the franchise rights. The improving numbers certainly indicate a level of maturity for the business, prompting the move to go public as well. However, risks remain, particularly in the performance of the ‘Healthy Foods’ segment and now, the Krispy Kreme franchise, which has not quite delivered in India, and continues to face a tough challenge to crack the local market. Curefoods and its multi-brand approach remains to be tested, especially with profits still distant, and H1 of FY26 will probably be a good time to evaluate if the firm has discovered a path to profitability.

Exclusive: Gaana acquired by Radio Mirchi’s parent for Rs 25 lakh

EntrackrEntrackr · 11m ago
Exclusive: Gaana acquired by Radio Mirchi’s parent for Rs 25 lakh
Medial

After a potential merger and acquisition talks with Airtel Wynk fell through, Times Internet and Tencent-backed Gaana consolidated with Times Group’s listed subsidiary Entertainment Network India Limited (ENIL) in December 2023. However, the deal somehow managed to bypass major media attention as of now. Significantly, Gaana was acquired for Rs 25 lakh, as per ENIL’s filings with the National Stock Exchange (NSE). ENIL is promoted by Bennett Coleman, and operates popular FM radio brand ‘Radio Mirchi’. For context, Gaana raised over $200 million in its lifetime, and was last valued at around $580 million, according to Entrackr’s data. Gaana’s consolidation with ENIL indicates that it’s a distress sale and the firm has given up on hopes of a third-party acquisition. The details of the acquisition are limited at the moment, and there is no clarity about Tencent’s holding in the 14-year-old platform. Entrackr’s queries sent to Times Internet and ENIL on Friday didn’t elicit any response. We will update the story in case they do. According to Entrackr’s data, Times Internet used to own a majority in Gaana whereas Tencent had around 35% stake until September 2020. To keep the platform up and running, Times Internet has also been injecting debt in Gaana at regular intervals. In July 2023, the music and podcast streaming platform received Rs 100 crore debt from Times Internet that eventually got converted into equity shares. Now, Times Internet has committed to inject up to Rs 10 crore debt in Gaana, as per its regulatory filings with the RoC this week. As per ENIL’s chief executive officer Yatish Mehrishi, the firm also invested Rs 15 crore in the first quarter of FY25. As the equity investments in India from its bordering companies aren’t allowed, Ganna received back-to-back debt rounds worth $90 million led by WeChat-owner Tencent in September 2020 and June 2021. The downfall of Gaana could also be ascertained from erosion of its scale which nosedived by over 80% to Rs 12.5 crore of revenue during the previous fiscal year (FY24), Mehrishi disclosed Gaana’s FY24 revenue numbers during investors’ call in May. After the acquisition, ENIL put Gana completely behind a paywall, and also doubled the subscription fee to Rs 599. These changes were reflected in its collection in the last quarter of FY24, which stood at Rs 9.5 crore. On the other hand, ENIL’s consolidated operating revenue shrank 25.79% Q-o-Q to Rs 113.46 crore but the Mumbai-based company slipped into red with Rs 5.45 crore losses in Q1 FY25. Gaana also went through a management rejig as it replaced its long time chief executive officer (CEO) Prashan Agarwal with Sandeep Lodha in mid-2021. Lodha also quit the firm in July 2023. At present, Gaana is being run by ENIL’s chief executive officer Mehrishi. Amidst the split of Times Group assets between Samir and Vineet Jain, Times Internet has been selling out its portfolio and incubated companies for the past three years. It recently sold its subsidiary ETMoney to 360 One (formerly IIFL Wealth) for about $44 million. This was the seventh subsidiary from which Times Internet took exit since 2021. In June, Amazon acquired the assets of MX Players from Times Internet. In February 2022, The Gurugram-based company sold MX TakaTak to ShareChat while DineOut was acquired by Swiggy in May 2022. In the same year, Times Internet sold its three companies MensXP, iDiva, and Hypp to e-commerce roll-up unicorn Mensa.

Decoding the financial health of leading cloud kitchen startups

EntrackrEntrackr · 1y ago
Decoding the financial health of leading cloud kitchen startups
Medial

The restaurant industry is witnessing a transformation with the rise of delivery-only models known as ‘cloud kitchens’, ‘virtual kitchens’, or ‘ghost kitchens’. These innovative concepts are reshaping how food is prepared, delivered, and consumed, challenging traditional restaurant models. According to a Redseer report, the estimated size of the cloud kitchen market would touch $3 billion by 2024, from $400 million in 2019. Moreover, top startups operating in the segment mopped up around $600 million in funding in the past three years and close to $1 billion since their inception, according to the startup intelligence platform TheKredible. Among India’s top cloud kitchen startups, Rebel Foods stands out as the poster boy with a topline of around Rs 1,200 crore in FY23. The list further includes Curefoods, EatClub, Biryani By Kilo, FreshMenu, Biryani Blues, Kitchens@, Bigspoon, Dil Foods, and HOI Foods. [Top funded cloud kitchen startups] Rebel Foods, which operates brands like Faasos (now EatSure), Oven Story, Lunch Box, The Good Bowl, Behrouz, Sweet Truth, and Firangi Bake, also emerged as the sole unicorn from the cloud kitchen space. The Peak XV Partners-backed company alone raised over $535 million to date whereas Curefoods scooped up around $170 million from the likes of Binny Bansal’s Three State Ventures, IronPillar, Chiratae, and Accel. In December 2023, Kitchens@ raised $65 million from London-based private equity firm Finnest. It’s worth highlighting that the firm also acquired Swiggy’s cloud kitchen’s business ‘Access Kitchens’ in a share swap deal in March last year. To recall, Swiggy entered the cloud kitchen business back in 2017. EatClub raised around $75 million across rounds including a $40 million round led by Tiger Global in December 2021. In 2022, it was also in the news for a secondary round worth $30 million. The firm operates several popular cloud kitchen brands such as Box8 and Mojo Pizza. Biryani By Kilo recently raised $9 million in an ongoing round, pushing the company’s total fundraise to $55 million to date. [Top revenue-generating cloud kitchen startups in India] Rebel Foods’ revenue from operations grew 39.2% to Rs 1,195 crore in FY23 from Rs 858.6 crore in FY22. Curefoods and EatClub follow closely, with revenues exceeding Rs 300 crore each. Biryani By Kilo also claims a revenue of around Rs 300 crore in FY23. However, beyond these frontrunners, no other brands have crossed the Rs 100 crore revenue mark as of March 2023. FreshMenu, Biryani Blues, and Kitchens@ recorded 7.5%, 53.7%, and 64.8% growth in revenue to Rs 70.21 crore, Rs 68.54 crore, and Rs 61.6 crore, respectively during FY23. While Dil Foods and HOI Foods posted Rs 7.08 crore and Rs 2.85 crore operating revenue during the year. [Spending by the cloud kitchen brands in FY23] Rebel Foods spent 31.6% of its total expenditure on the cost of materials amounting to Rs 577.54 crore while 22.2% or Rs 405.46 crore on the employee benefit cost. The overall cost of the company surged 27.9% to Rs 1,827 crore during FY23 from Rs 1429 crore in FY22. Curefoods, EatClub, FreshMenu, and Biryani Blues also spent the most on the cost of materials accounting for Rs 171.7 crore, Rs 126.17 crore, Rs 27.48 crore, and Rs 25.88 crore respectively. Whereas, employee benefit costs of these brands stood at Rs 103.5 crore, Rs 99.5 crore, Rs 17.31 crore, and Rs 14.2 crore. Kitchens@, Dil Foods, and HOI Foods spent the most on employee benefits followed by the cost of materials. In line with revenue, Rebel Foods is also on top in terms of losses. Though, the rise in losses is lower than revenue growth. The company’s losses went up nearly 23% to Rs 656.5 crore during FY23. Curefoods’ bottom line jumped 4.7X to Rs 342.7 crore while EatClub’s losses rose 53.8% to Rs 69 crore during the period. Kitchens@ (Rs 27.3 crore), Biryani Blues (Rs 15.42 crore), FreshMenu (Rs 10.15 crore), HOI Foods (Rs 1.23 crore), and Dil Foods (Rs 0.9 crore) are next in line in terms of losses. [A look at unit economics of top cloud kitchen brands] On a unit level, Rebel Foods, Curefoods, and EatClub spent Rs 1.53, 1.97, and 1.25 to earn a rupee of operating revenue in FY23. Despite their impressive revenue growth, profitability remains a challenge for many cloud kitchen startups. [Conclusion] When we compare the numbers of these players with the large listed players, we see a clear difference in critical cost heads like cost of material, employee costs. Those are areas that will need a continuous improvement in metrics, for these firms to make a serious push for profitability. While some like Freshmenu are in a clear battle to survive until the market turns into a less hostile environment, almost none of these firms can afford to burn through funds as they did in the pre-pandemic years. Even as customers seem to be reconciling to the sharp increase in sticker prices on the menu, pressure on margins from delivery, fast turning into duopoly, will ensure there is little respite in the immediate future. It will take some significant structural changes in the market, in terms of opportunity as well as growth drivers, for these firms to truly sizzle.

The transformative journey of used car startups in India: Report

EntrackrEntrackr · 1y ago
The transformative journey of used car startups in India: Report
Medial

The Indian used car market is witnessing a significant transformation, driven by various factors such as the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on individual mobility preferences, increased financing options in the used car market, and reduced cash inflow for new car purchases. And perhaps most importantly now, the new and spreading norms on the scrapping of cars. This shift has led to a surge in availability, and demand for used cars, with buyers seeking alternatives to new vehicles. The market is poised for considerable growth, especially with the implementation of new emission standards and focusing on reducing diesel car production. As per a report by Motor Intelligence, the Indian used car market is expected to reach $31.62 billion in 2024 and grow at a CAGR of 15.10% to reach $63.87 billion by 2029. Among the used car companies in India, Cars24 is leading the pack with over Rs 5,500 crore in earnings. Spinny achieved the second position last year with nearly 30X growth in revenue. CarDekho, CarTrade, OLX and Droom are next on the list. The funding and valuation game The used car space has witnessed four unicorns so far including Cars24, Spinny, CarDekho, and Droom. Valuation-wise, Cars24 is on top with $3.3 billion followed by Spinny, CarDekho, and Droom. At the same time, CarTrade’s market capitalization stands at around $370 million. Notably, all of these raised their last funding in 2021. In contrast, OLX has not raised any funding for a long time. Rising scale of leading used car players Cars24’s revenue from operations marginally declined 8.9% to Rs 5,534 crore during the last fiscal year while in grabbing the second spot, Spinny’s scale jumped nearly 30X to Rs 3,261 crore. CarDekho also managed 46% growth with Rs 2,332 crore in revenue. However, the company is also involved in other operations like insurance, marketing et al. Its revenue from the sale of used cars stood at Rs 952 crore during the period. CarTrade’s sales grew 16.3% to Rs 363.7 crore in FY23 as compared to Rs 312.7 crore in FY22. OLX and Droom recorded Rs 514.92 crore and Rs 253.3 crore in revenue during FY23, respectively. For context, Cars24 makes over 90% of its revenue from the sale of cars while a small part comes from financial services. Similarly, Spinny made 95% of its revenue from the sale of cars while the remaining was from services, including commissions on car sales and financial services. Where are the used car companies spending? Cars24 spent over 80% of its expenses on the procurement of goods while Spinny and CarDekho booked 72% and 33.7%, respectively, under the same. CarDekho spent 21.7% of its cost on employee benefits and 21.1% on advertising and promotional expenses. CarTrade incurred the majority (55.9%) of its expenditure on employee benefits followed by promotional and other expenses. The red and green: Bottomline of the used car players Listed on the stock exchange, CarTrade is the only profitable company among the leading players as of FY23. The company posted Rs 40.4 crore profits in FY23 against Rs 121.3 crore in losses the previous year. On the back of rising expenses, Spinny has the highest losses, but not the worst margins. Its losses crossed the Rs 800 crore benchmark in FY23. CarDekho and Cars24 are next in line with Rs 566 crore and Rs 467.7 crore losses, respectively. Meanwhile, CarDekho’s auto business reported Rs 360 crore losses during the period. A look at Covid & Pre-Covid performance The COVID-19 pandemic impact on Cars24, CarTrade, and Droom was big enough to lead to a decline in revenue. On the other hand, CarDekho and Spinny managed to achieve positive growth, although below expectations. Consolidations in used car space The pre-owned car space also saw a bunch of consolidation as bigger brands took over smaller ones over the past five-six years. CarDekho topped the list with seven acquisitions including Revv, Carmudi, Carbiqi, Help on Wheels, ZigWheels, BuyingIQ, and Gaadi.com. Listed company CarsTrade took over Olx Auto, SAMIL, Adroit Inspection, and CarWale whereas Spinny acquired three startups – Scouto, Truebil, and HopCar – since its inception in 2015. OLX as a group acquired around 12 companies which also included global companies such as Sulit and Tokobagus. Recent Developments Delhi NCR-based Cars24 is reportedly piloting a new service that allows car owners to hire drivers on-demand on an hourly basis. The startup had launched a separate app – Autopilot Driver – a few months ago to onboard drivers for the new service. CarDekho shut down its used car retail business amid continuously losing money in the B2C model because of high burn on parking, showrooms, and manpower without any sight of profitability. User behavioural shift in the used cars segment Second-hand cars have been in fashion for eons. However, there has long been a stigma attached to owning a used car. Beyond social status and related concerns, people have had trust issues regarding sellers’ credentials, the history of cars, and so forth. The growing number of startups in this space, however, have democratized the process and have made it more accessible to common users. While increased accessibility and the shedding of stigma are commonly observed, there has been a big change in how people approach used cars. As mentioned above, the pandemic has also had a significant impact, alongside changes in policies and advancements in technology. The trend toward choosing used cars is growing stronger for several practical reasons, a Cars24 spokesperson said. “Buyers are discovering that used cars offer significant value, allowing access to higher-end models and features without the steep price of a new vehicle. The reliability of used cars has greatly improved, thanks to comprehensive inspections and refurbishments, making them a dependable choice. Additionally, the fact that new cars depreciate quickly makes pre-owned vehicles an appealing option for those looking to maximise their investment. This shift in consumer behaviour reflects a smarter, more value-conscious approach to car buying,” the spokesperson explains. The spokesperson further said that car buyers in India are ready to spend 30% (FY22 vs FY23) more on their vehicles, steering towards models with premium features and better overall quality. There is also a surge in demand for SUVs. EVs are too making their way in the used car segment. “In 2023, there was a phenomenal 5X surge in enquiries for EVs on the platform, reflecting a growing interest in alternative fuel options and a shift towards cost-efficient and eco-conscious driving,” the spokesperson said, adding that Cars24 is currently averaging 200 enquiries daily for EVs. CarDekho is also bullish on the used car segment. “Used cars will still continue to do fine as the older vehicles will migrate out of metros,” said Amit Jain, co-founder and CEO of CarDekho Group. Jain also highlighted that demand for used cars is mostly from individual users as cab drivers need a yellow plate which is expensive, making the proposition unviable for cab drivers. “Cab drivers also need CNG installations as most of the used cars are either petrol or diesel which add extra burden on them,” he added. TheKredible’s take Even as it is a huge and growing market, it is well known that making money in the market is a different ball game. Buyers have the option of direct deals with owners, free listing sites and of course, a massive unorganised market, before they approach the organised players. With the option of going with the firms floated by automakers such as Maruti Suzuki True Value and First Choice are always there in case of a purchase. Thus, beyond the obvious issue of price for both sellers and buyers, these firms have to invest in differentiators that will be valued. The high losses and lack of loyalty indicate just how little success they have had in this effort. We believe lasting success in the category will continue to demand a long-term, high-investment approach that not all the existing players will survive.

Indian startups mop up $2.77 Bn in March 2024 quarter: Report

EntrackrEntrackr · 1y ago
Indian startups mop up $2.77 Bn in March 2024 quarter: Report
Medial

Indian startups registered a steady growth in fund inflow during the first quarter of 2023 as they managed to cross $2.75 billion in funding. Importantly, funding in March stood out for crossing the $1 billion threshold for the first time in 2024. However, even as funding recovers, layoffs, shutdowns and departure of top-level executives continue to loom. Indian startups mopped up $2.77 billion across 326 deals in the March quarter or Q1 2024, as per data compiled by TheKredible. This included 74 growth-stage deals worth $1.87 billion and 213 early-stage deals amounting to $898 million. There were 39 undisclosed rounds. Unlike in the first quarter of 2023, two startups – Krutrim SI Designs and Perfios – entered the unicorn club after their latest fundraise in the first quarter of 2024. [Month-on-Month and Year-on-Year trend] March saw a decent jump in funding to $1.18 billion from $875 million in February and over $700 million in January. However, on a year-on-year basis, Q1 2024 recorded a fall from $12 billion in Q1 2022 and $3.4 billion in Q1 2023. [Top growth stage deals] Biotech startup Engrail scooped up $157 million in its Series B funding round to become the top-funded growth stage company in the first quarter of 2024. Audio series platform Pocket FM and logistics company Shadowfax managed to go past the $100 million funding mark in Q1 2024. Capillary Technologies, Perfios, Vivifi, Lohum, AiDash, ShareChat and Wow! Momo, were among the top 10 growth-stage deals. [Top early-stage deals] Digital lending platform mPokket, AI company Krutrim, energy tech company International Battery Company (IBC), blockchain company Avail, and generative AI startup Ema topped the list of early-stage startups. Check TheKredible for a full list. [City and segment-wise deals] City-wise, Bengaluru-based startups remain on top with 122 deals, contributing around 54% of the overall funding in the first quarter of 2024. Delhi-NCR and Mumbai followed with 77 and 54 deals, respectively. The list further counts Pune, Hyderabad, Chennai, Kolkata, Jaipur, Ahmedabad, and Thane among others. Segment-wise, e-commerce startups (including D2C brands) led the list with 64 deals followed by fintech (47), healthtech (31), SaaS (26), EV (15), AI (13), and edtech (13) startups. The complete breakdown of the city and segment can be found at TheKredible. [Stage-wise deals] Series-wise, 95 startups raised funding in Seed round followed by 71 Series A, 35 Pre-Series A, and 33 Pre-seed deals. Among early-stage, as many as 4 startups raised funding in their angel round. While 22 startups raised debt funding worth $276.65 million during the period. [Most active investors] Early-stage venture capital firm Inflection Point Ventures and Blume Ventures have emerged as the most active investors in Q1 2024 with 11 and 10 investments, respectively. Venture Catalysts was next on the list with nine deals followed by Fireside Ventures, Anicut, Accel, and Stride Ventures. The full list can be found at TheKredible. [Mergers and acquisitions] The first quarter of 2024 registered 26 merger and acquisition deals. Acquisition of Tapasya Educational Institutions by Veranda, InSemi by Infosys, Qdigi Services by Onsitego were the top 3 disclosed mergers and acquisitions deals. During the period, listed gaming firm Nazara’s subsidiary Nodwin acquired two startups: Comic Con India and Ninja Global FZCO. Among the undisclosed deals, Kuvera was acquired by fintech unicorn CRED, Captain Fresh took over CenSea while OneVerse acquired three startups including Spartan Poker, BatBall11, and Calling Station. Check the full list here. [Layoffs, shutdowns and departures] Layoffs continued in the March quarter as more than 1,100 employees received pink slips. Among them, foodtech company Swiggy topped the list with laying off of 350 employees followed by Cult.fit, InMobi, and Pristyn Care with 150, 125 and 120 employees, respectively. During the first quarter, five companies shut their operations. The list includes Resso, Rario, OKX India, GoldPe, and Muvin. Rario, however, added that it will launch a brand new platform that will enable users to play new and engaging cricket-based games. Besides layoffs and shutdowns, nearly two dozen top-level executives hung up their boots. Vijay Shekhar Sharma, founder of Paytm Payments Bank, resigned as the part-time non-executive chairman and board member of the company. Meanwhile, Third Wave Coffee’s chief executive officer Sushant Goel stepped down from his position to become a board member. The list also includes Indus Appstore CEO Rakesh Deshmukh, DealShare’s co-founder Sourjyendu Medda, and Fashinza’s co-founder Jamil Ahmed. [ESOP buyback] Amid all the ups and downs, the startup ecosystem witnessed employees stock buyback by growth and late-stage companies. For context, e-commerce company Meesho rolled out its largest ESOP buyback worth $25 million for 1,700 employees. Community management app MyGate and edtech company Classplus also announced their employee stock buyback program earlier this year. The full list can be found here. Visit TheKredible to see series-wise deals along with amount breakup, complete details of fund launches, and more insights. [Conclusion] As funding revives, it is safe to say that the trend in layoffs will also subside in the coming months, if not weeks. The strength in fintechs continues, and the category will continue to seek more money and throw up the next big startups, as scale arrives faster for many. Newer categories, be it AI, Chip Design, or niche parts of healthtech look set to emerge soon, going by the churning in the markets. The big hope is that the many corporate governance issues that have plagued the ecosystem in the past two years will also take a backseat now, thanks to lessons learnt hopefully. Looking at the numbers, especially for Q1 2022 ($12 billion), many would say that opportunities and capital have been wasted. But that is the very nature of the Startup world, with tiny amounts of money and a dollop of innovation sometimes achieving what no amount of money thrown at a problem doesn’t. We remain optimistic that by Q4 of this year, India’s startup ecosystem will be stronger and more diversified than ever before.

Layoffs, departures continue as Indian startups raise $1 Bn in April: Report

EntrackrEntrackr · 1y ago
Layoffs, departures continue as Indian startups raise $1 Bn in April: Report
Medial

The year 2024 started on a good note for Indian startups: an average of $1 billion in monthly funding, which is a significant growth when compared to the previous year during which monthly funding went below $500 million three times. In April 2024, however, startups crossed the $1 billion threshold on the back of a couple of pre-IPO funding, a few late-stage rounds, and debt deals. Indian startups raked in more than $1 billion across 124 deals in April, according to data compiled by startup data intelligence platform TheKredible. This included 36 growth-stage deals worth $813 million and 65 early-stage deals amounting to $225.75 million. Moreover, there were 23 undisclosed rounds, primarily early-stage deals. During the recent Startup Mahakumbh festival, Peak XV Partners’ managing director Rajan Anandan said that Indian startups are expected to raise $8 billion to $12 billion this year. He also added that around $20 billion of private capital is lying uninvested and is committed to investment in private firms and startups in India. This estimate appears close considering the current rate of monthly funding. [Month-on-Month and Year-on-Year trend] In April 2024, there was a 14% year-on-year jump in funding from $912 million in the same month last year. Even on a monthly basis, April almost matched March’s $1.18 billion funding. Interestingly, only one startup i.e. PharmEasy managed to raise funding in three digits during the last month. Since January, homegrown startups have raised close to $4 billion, and at this rate, it may cross the $11 billion funding raised in 2023. [Top growth stage deals] Healthcare startup PharmEasy’s $216 million pre-IPO round stood at the top, though its valuation dropped nearly 90% from $5.6 billion to $710 million during the latest fundraise. Financial services firm Northern Arc also announced its $80 million Series C round while Ola Electric raised $50 million in debt even after filing draft IPO papers. Altum Credo, ProcMart, SingleInterface, Infinity Fincorp, CloudExtel, and LetsTransport also featured in the top 10 growth stage deals in April. [Top early-stage deals] Omnichannel fashion startup Lyskraft, founded by Zomato’s co-founder Mohit Gupta and Myntra and Cultfit’s co-founder Mukesh Bansal, scooped up $26 million in a seed funding round and was on the top of the list in early-stage deals in April. Gen AI startup Neysa bagged $20 million whereas spacetech company Dhruva Space and edtech firm Emversity (Beyond Odds) raised $15 million and $11 million, respectively. The rest of the early-stage startups in the top 10 list raised less than $10 million each. The list includes Traya, LightFury Games, GTM Buddy, FincFriends, and Accacia. [City and segment-wise deals] City-wise, expectedly, Bengaluru-based startups are on top with 42 deals, contributing around 26% of the overall funding in April. Delhi-NCR and Mumbai followed with 30 and 26 deals, respectively. However, Mumbai-based startups topped the list in terms of the total amount raised. The list further counts Kolkata, Hyderabad, Pune, and Ahmedabad among others. Segment-wise, e-commerce startups (including D2C brands) and fintech startups co-led the list with 19 deals each followed by healthtech (16), SaaS (15), EV (5), automotive tech (4), and foodtech (4) startups among others. Visit TheKredible for more details. [Stage-wise deals] Series-wise, 44 startups raised funding in the Seed round followed by 20 Series A deals, 13 Pre-Series A, 11 Series B deals, and 7 Pre-Seed deals. As many as 14 startups raised debt funding worth $199.2 million during the period. [Mergers and acquisitions] Indian startups saw nearly a dozen mergers and acquisitions in April of which most deals were undisclosed. Among the disclosed deals, National Investment and Infrastructure Fund (NIIF) acquired a majority stake in digital infrastructure solutions company iBUS for about $200 million. US-based Aurionpro Solutions also acquired Indian fintech company Arya.ai for $16.5 million. The notable list of M&A also includes the acquisition of Shy Tiger brands by Ghost Kitchens India, Orbit by Postman, Awign by MyNavi, and Magzter by Dailyhunt’s parent company VerSe Innovations. [Layoffs, top-level exits, and shutdown/s] The mass firing in startups continued in April as they laid off nearly 1,500 employees during the month. April surpassed the cumulative layoffs of 1,100 employees during the first quarter of 2024. Troubled edtech company Byju’s remained on top with 500 layoffs, followed by The Good Glamm Group, Healthify, and Scaler with 150 layoffs each. Check the full list here. April also saw high-profile exits from startups including five chief executives. Sujot Malhotra, CEO of Beardo, Surinder Chawla, CEO of Paytm Payments Bank, Arjun Mohan, CEO of Byju’s India, Sukhleen Aneja, CEO of The Good Glamm Group’s D2C Brands Division and Hemanth Bakshi, CEO of Ola Cabs, have quit this month. Besides layoffs and departures, Nintee, a digital health startup launched by Wingify founder Paras Chopra, announced shutting down its operations after a year of launch. During the first three months of 2024, six startups announced their shutting down operations in India. [ESOP buyback] Employees’ stock buyback also continued in April as three growth-stage companies – Pocket FM, XYXX, and The Sleep Company – announced their ESOP buyback program last month. Pocket FM bought back $8.3 million worth of stocks from employees while the rest two did not disclose the transaction details. The March quarter saw four ESOP buybacks including MyGate, Meesho, Classplus, and Imagekit. Visit TheKredible to see series-wise deals along with amount breakup, complete details of fund launches, and more insights. [Conclusion] While the trajectory of fund raising is positive, its quality might worry some, as it has gone to a firm that was clearly in distress and at a massive haircut (PharmEasy), besides the large, lumpy deal from NIIF. It might also be time to relook debt funding numbers as part of overall startup funding figures, as debt is usually taken by startups that are running operations sustainably from a financial perspective, or where founders do not want to dilute stakes any more. So it’s not quite the risk capital that equity funding is. With a host of IPOs being lined up, we expect the growth trajectory to sustain as pleased investors return to find the next big opportunity.

Download the medial app to read full posts, comements and news.